ESTATE PLANNING: ROBB’S EASY OVERVIEW...©
In its
simple form, estate planning deals with how to pass property to
someone else when you die. There are several methods and we will
outline them here. These methods are all separate and independent
of each other. This is not intended to be an exhaustive outline
and there are always exceptions to all rules. We would be happy to answer questions about your specific situation.
Just drop us an email or make an appointment to come in for a
more detailed explanation. As in everything we do, your matters
will be kept in the utmost confidence.
METHOD
NUMBER 1.
JOINT
TENANCY OWNERSHIP.
You can
own property with another person and title it as “joint tenants
with rights of survivorship and not as tenants in common.”
This means that the title is held in two or more names
and contain the magic words "joint tenants."
This form of ownership instantly and automatically transfers
property at death to the surviving owners.
It is not the fact that there are two or more names on
the property that make this work. It works due to the magic words
“joint tenancy.” If the magic words are not present then this
will not work. The law
specifically presumes that you did not intend to create a joint
tenancy if the words are not present.
The account
is titled “John Doe and Mary Doe as joint tenants with rights
of survivorship and not as tenants in common.”
Advantages:
l With
this form of ownership no lawyers are usually needed at death.
l Property
does not have to go through the probate court at death.
l It
is simple to understand and set up.
l It
is an inexpensive planning tool.
l The
property transfer is instant and automatic at death.
Disadvantages:
l Joint tenancy does not apply to all property
types.
l It is an “item by item” plan. The title to each asset must contain the names
of the co-owners and the magic words must be present. Every time
you change your mind you have to change the title to all of the
assets involved.
l Because it is so simple and easy, joint tenancy
has the potential for misuse.
l It should
NOT be used instead of a power of attorney to gain help
in paying your bills.
l It can require the consent of all owners to
deal with your property. You may have to get your children’s permission
to cash an investment.
l Joint tenancy property may be subject to the
creditors of any owners. This
means that a garnishment intended for one of your children may
tie up your property.
l Joint tenency property may become entangled
with property division by a divorce court of any owner. A lawyer can usually extract it from the court
but it may cost time and money.
l Joint tenancy can have disastrous Federal Estate
Tax results in some situations.
l If all assets are titled in this fashion, there
is no fund from which to pay your last expenses. Each of the beneficiaries must contribute back
to some common fund for the payment of bills and the funeral.
l Joint
tenancy carries with it no protection for minors. The minor cannot
legally deal with it and it may require that a conservator be
appointed to deal on behalf of the minor.
l Your intended recipients may get left out if
a joint tenant dies before you do.
It will leave out your grandkids from that child and leave
it all to the surviving joint tenants.
It works
rather well for passing property between husband and wife with
estates that are not taxable.
There are probably better methods for other situations.
METHOD
NUMBER 2.
BENEFICIARY
DESIGNATIONS.
This
method only applies to certain types of property.
Examples are life insurance, IRA accounts, retirement plans,
401k plans, Keogh plans, POD (Pay On Death) and TOD (Transfer
On Death) accounts, TOD (Transfer On Death) deeds, and TOD (Transfer
On Death) car titles. The title to the property remains in your name
and you designate a beneficiary to receive the property at your
death.
The account
is titled “John Doe, pay on death to Suzy Doe.”
Advantages:
l Usually no lawyers are necessary to set up
this method.
l Asset transfers instantly and automatically
at death.
l No probate court proceeding is necessary at
death.
l It
is simple to understand and set up.
l It
is an inexpensive planning tool.
Disadvantages:
l Beneficiary designations do not apply to all
property types.
l It
is an “item by item” plan. The
title to each asset must be placed in this form and a beneficiary
named. Every time you change your mind you must change the beneficiary
designations on all of the assets involved.
l Can be a challenge treat all children equally.
l Because
it is so simple and easy, it has the potential for misuse.
l If all assets are titled in this fashion, there
is no fund from which to pay last expenses. Each of the beneficiaries must contribute back to some common fund
for the payment of bills and the funeral.
l It
can have disasterous Federal Estate Tax consequenses in some estates.
l It
carries with it no protection for minors. The minor cannot legally
deal with it and it may require that a conservator be appointed
to deal on behalf of the minor.
l Your intended recipients may get left out if
a beneficiary dies before you do.
It will leave out your grandkids from that child and leave
it all to the surviving beneficiaries.
l Special beneficiary designations can be very
difficult to get set up.
METHOD
NUMBER 3.
WILLS.
A will
is a document that expresses where you would like your property
to go at your death. These documents require strict formalities
to be valid. If a formality
is not followed, the will can be void. The manner in which it
is signed must adhere to a very strict procedure.
This is not the place for do-it-yourself documents. The
plan outlined in your will does not become operative until your
death and your will only works on property that stands in your
name alone. Wills can
be amended or revoked before death as long as you are competent.
Additionally, it can name guardians and conservators for minors
and/or can establish a trust to protect minors or disabled children. A will is not effective unless probated at
death. This probate process does involve both the
court and lawyers.
Advantages:
l An estate plan using a will can be fairly easily
and inexpensively put together by your lawyer.
l It is a comprehensive estate plan that can
dispose of all of your assets in one document. If you change your
mind you just have to change one document, your will.
l Titles to assets do not have to be changed.
l You can leave all of your property in your
name alone without inviting interference from children.
l A will can be changed as often as you wish
without the hassle of retitling your assets at the bank.
l Charitable gifts can be included and changed
from time to time in a fairly easy fashion.
l Very simple and understandible dispository
language can be used: “I leave all of my property to my children
in equal shares.”
l You can name guardians and conservators and
trustees to manage matters for your minor children after you are
gone.
l You can appoint who you wish to be the executor
and manage your estate after your death. This can be a responsible child or an unrelated professional.
l Estate administration can be fairly simple.
Your chosen executor inventories the property, pays your
final bills and then distributes the remainder to your beneficiaries.
l An estate plan with a will is a relatively
inexpensive plan at the time that you do the planning.
Disadvantages:
l At the time of death, a will must go through
the probate process to be valid.
This involves using a lawyer and the court system and thus
can be somewhat costly.
l The minumum time for completing the probate
process is six months. While
distributions can be made within this time, the estate cannot
be finally settled until the proper statutory time has elapsed.
l While your plan is very confidential during
your lifetime, many matters concerning your estate are public
at your death. When your
will is filed for probate it is available for the public to read. The process requires that your executor file an inventory of your
assets with the court and this is public information also.
l While an estate plan with a will may be relatively
less costly at the time that you do your planning, it is relatively
more costly at the time of your death due to the probate process
that is involved.
METHOD
NUMBER 4.
REVOCABLE
LIVING TRUSTS.
A revocable
living trust (also known as an intervivos trust) is a signed agreement
between you and whoever will be your trustee.
You can be your own trustee if you wish. It states what
happens to your property during your lifetime (the trustee will
hold it, invest it, pay your bills, give back to you if you want
it back, etc.) Then, at
disability or death the trust designates a new trustee or trustees
to take over, and at death the trust instructs trustee to pay
your final bills, pay taxes, and distribute what is left to your
beneficiaries.
An estate
plan using these trusts have a two stage process.
First, you must get documents correct and signed. Secondly,
you must transfer all of your assets to the trust.
It is very important to get all assets transferred as major
benefits are lost if assets are missed.
All plans
involving revocable trusts should also have a “pourover will.” This is a will that leaves everything to your trust. This will serves as a safety net in case you
forget to place some assets in your trust, but it is generally
hoped that this will is not needed at death because all assets
will already be in the trust.
Advantages:
l The largest advantage to a revocable trust
is that is avoids the probate process.
At death, your trustee simply follows the instructions
set out in the trust document and settles your estate.
l At death or disability, there is no court involvement
and oftentimes very little attorney involvement.
l It is private. Because there is no probate court process, your planning wishes
and assets remain confidential.
l It is a comprehensive estate planning tool
that works on your entire estate. It
is not the “asset by asset” process involved with joint tenancy
or beneficiary methods.
l It is easy to amend or change as your intent
changes. Best practice is to restate the trust rather than hook
together a string of amendments and this is easily done with modern
technology.
l It is the most economical plan at death.
l This plan also provides for easy management
succession during life if you become sick or disabled. Your next named trustee simply steps up and
begins to help.
l Very simple and understandible dispository
language can be used: “I leave all of my property to my children
in equal shares.”
l You can name guardians and conservators and
trustees to manage matters for your minor children after you are
gone.
l You can appoint anyone you wish to be the trustee.
You can appoint yourself to start with and then appoint successor
trustees as you wish. Many
folks appoint their children as co-trustees or successor trustees.
You may also appoint an unrelated professional who has experience
in handling trust matters. This sometimes relieves the stress
among children revolving around power issues and arguements over
who is going to be in charge.
Disadvantages:
l The trust process is more complicated at the
time you do your planning. More information must be provided to
your planner to get the desired end product.
l Assets must actually be transferred to the
trust. This is a very
detailed oriented process that is absolutely necessary to acheive
the goal of probate avoidance.
It can be a costly process depending on the assets owned.
Most folks can do most of their own transfers to hold costs down.
l The documents in the trust process tend to
be more complicated than a simple will.
There are many contigencies that are covered and this makes
for a more complicated document set.
l The trust process normally costs more at the
planning stage and less at death.
A will plan normally costs less in the planning process
and more at death.
METHOD
NUMBER 5.
OTHER
METHODS.
While
these are not seen as often, other estate planning tools include
life estate transfers, intestate succession (the state draws a
will for you), irrevocable trusts, and disclaimers. These
have limited application today and are not in general use except
for special circumstances. As
we plan estates we will suggest these methods if they seem to
be a reasonable approach to a specific
estate planning problem or issue.
METHODS
ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.
Again,
these methods are all separate and independent of each
other. If an asset is held in joint tenancy a will
or trust will not effect that asset.
If a beneficiary method is used then a will does not pass
that asset. If an asset is in a trust then a will does
not pass it. Each method
is separate and independent of the other methods.
The clearest
example to illustrate this principle would be a person who draws
a will and leaves everything “to my five children in equal shares.” They then go to the bank and add the eldest son to all of the accounts
as a “joint tenent” so that they can have help paying their bills
if they become ill or disabled.
This person will think that the estate goes to all of the
children as dictated by the will.
Having read this overview you now know that the elder son
recieves those assets outright as the surviving joint tenant.
This is not the desired result.
A little proper estate planning is needed.
Documents
in a normal estate plan include a durable business power of attorney,
which allows someone you appoint to do business for you while
you are living (the power ends at your death); a durable healthcare
power of attorney, which allows someone you appoint to make healthcare
decisions for you if you are incapacitated; a Living Will or Natural
Death Declaration, in which case, if two doctors agree your condition
is terminal, they are directed not to artificially prolong the
dying process; a will or revocable trust document; and a pourover
will (if a trust).
Benefits
to this method are that this does avoid probate court if all assets
held by trust, it is a comprehensive plan and easy to change,
it is private (no asset inventory filed in a court), it provides
succession of management of affairs if become disabled during
life, provides protection for minors, and has a relatively lower
cost at death.
Revocable
trusts, however, have a more
involved process to set up, they require more paperwork now and
transferring of titles of property to the trust now, and they
have a relatively higher cost now.
TAXATION
ISSUES.

Kansas
Estate Tax. Kansas has the same exemption amounts as the
Federal Estate Tax. This
is a credit and a deduction on the Federal Estate
Tax return, and its effective rate is included in the Federal
Estate Tax rate.
Federal
Gift Tax. This
is a unified tax system with the Federal Estate Tax (lifetime
combined gift and estate exemptions are listed above). The annual exclusion is $10,000 per recipient,
meaning that there is no gift tax or return due for these gifts,
but gift tax returns must be filed for all gifts over this amount. A husband and wife can give $20,000 to each
recipient, but there is often not a tax reason to make these gifts
until a single estate exceeds the exemption amount.
Selected
Income Tax issues. Your income tax basis steps up to the date
of death value at death. You
pay capital gain tax on any increase in value over your cost. This gain goes untaxed if you die owning an
appreciated asset, so stock that you paid $1,000 for is now worth
$20,000. If you sell it you owe capital gain tax on
the gain of $19,000. If
you die owning it your beneficiaries get a basis of $20,000 and
can sell it without paying any income tax.
Traditional
IRAs and retirement plans are taxed as you withdraw from them. If you die and have assets in these plans your beneficiaries pay
the income tax as they withdraw the money from the plans. If you are in the 0% or 15% income tax bracket
and your children are in the 28% or 31% bracket or higher then
it does not make much sense to leave it to them to pay the taxes. Better strategy is to at least use up the 15%
tax bracket each year by cashing some IRA assets.
LONG
TERM CARE ISSUES
Long
term care insurance. The lifetime chances of residing in a nursing
home:
This
means that there is a fairly good chance that either a husband
or wife may need nursing care at some point in their lives.
There is actually a much higher chance of needing nursing
care than of your house burning down or being blown away in a
tornado yet we all purchase homeowners insurance.
There is also a much higher chance of needing nursing care
than of having a large liability from an auto accident yet we
all purchase auto insurance.
Long
term care insurance is affordable at younger ages and becomes
very expensive at older ages. These rates come from a Kansas Insurance
Department publication as examples:
Coverage for $70 per day, 90 day elimination period, lifetime
benefit-
Age 55 - annual premium ranges from $180 to $581
Age 60 - annual premium ranges from $286 to $798
Age 65 - annual premium ranges from $464 to $1162
Age 75 - annual premium ranges from $1235 to $2954
Age 79 - annual premium ranges from $1726 to $4214
At age 55 a
couple can purchase two policies for roughly $300 each, or $600
per year. If they pay these premiums for 25 years (until
age 80) they will have invested $15,000. If either one of them ever resides in a nursing home for only 7
months they will get all of their money back.
Medicaid. If
a person needs nursing care and has exhausted all of their assets
then the state will pay for their nursing care.
However, their sssets must be spent down to less than $2000. Some items do not count, such as prepaid funeral
plans, household goods, and a home if you plan to return to it.
Other
things disqualify you from Medicaid, such as too many assets and
gifts. The lookback period is 36 months for individuals
and 60 months for trusts and gifts within this period disqualify
you from receiving Medicaid.
Gifts prior to this are not counted.
There
is a system for dividing assets when one spouse needs nursing
care and the other spouse does not.
They allow you to divide the assets and when the sick spouse
has spent down their assets Medicaid takes over.
Whenever
Medicaid pays for a person’s care a lien arises for the amount
expended against the property of the person and the person’s spouse. This lien is not enforceable until the death of the person or their
spouse.
|